Quantcast
Channel: KING KONG (1933)
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 11 View Live

KING KONG (1933)

The King Still Reigns Supreme I apologize if this sounds more like a gushing fan's praise-fest than an actual review, but frankly, the subject matter demands it. So, bear with me as I indulge...

View Article



Re: KING KONG (1933)

What you said, Casey.

View Article

Re: KING KONG (1933)

Just a footnote regarding what I stated about the Kong/Ann Darrow relationship: What we have in the 1933 original isn't a 'flaw', but rather a reversal of audience sympathy. In the first half of the...

View Article

Re: KING KONG (1933)

Casey62 wrote:Just a footnote regarding what I stated about the Kong/Ann Darrow relationship: What we have in the 1933 original isn't a 'flaw', but rather a reversal of audience sympathy. In the first...

View Article

Re: KING KONG (1933)

So true, Casey. It's difficult to pinpoint the exact moment in the film in which our sympathies transfer from Ann (and to a lesser degree, Denham & Company) to Kong. It's probably Kong's heroic...

View Article


Re: KING KONG (1933)

telegonus wrote:So true, Casey. It's difficult to pinpoint the exact moment in the film in which our sympathies transfer from Ann (and to a lesser degree, Denham & Company) to Kong. It's probably...

View Article

Re: KING KONG (1933)

This shift in audience sympathy, I believe, is key in understanding the superiority of the original over the remakes, yet it's hardly ever brought up. In both the '76 and '05 versions we're 'told' to...

View Article

Re: KING KONG (1933)

You nailed it, Casey . That's a perfect analysis of why the 1933 original is so great. It also, of course, benefits hugely from its having been made at a time when people didn't travel so much or so...

View Article


Re: KING KONG (1933)

telegonus wrote:It also, of course, benefits hugely from its having been made at a time when people didn't travel so much or so often, least of all Americans to such places as the Dutch East Indies,...

View Article


Re: KING KONG (1933)

Something else worth considering is that stop-motion animation didn't take off until Ray Harryhausen's films of the 1950's - 20 years after KONG. Before Ray hit it big, what animated giant monsters...

View Article

Re: KING KONG (1933)

telegonus wrote: It also, of course, benefits hugely from its having been made at a time when people didn't travel so much or so often, least of all Americans to such places as the Dutch East Indies,...

View Article
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 11 View Live




Latest Images